X-Originating-IP:	[24.232.1.206]
From:	"Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<9cg46n$kk5$1 AT sunlight DOT pku DOT edu DOT cn>
Subject:	Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 04:11:10 -0300
Organization:	nBens@ Computers
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID:	<OE80iPNMwplEHXU1dtm0000124c@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	29 Apr 2001 07:14:19.0105 (UTC) FILETIME=[01CC1D10:01C0D07C]
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/v2faq/faq8_14.html

Regards,
Norberto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny" <dguo AT 263 DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 01:01
Subject: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler


> Hi, THere.
>
> I have got both gcc for djgpp and borland C compiler (bcc32). I compared
> them on a simple 'hello world' C code. I found gcc made a EXE with size of
> 107,516bytes, while bcc32 generated a EXE with size of 52,736bytes.
>
> How come they are so different?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Dan
>
>

- Raw text -