Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:37:39 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"ypwang" <ypwang AT sitechasia DOT com>
Message-Id:	<2427-Fri16Feb2001123739+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<96iivg$ssn$1@mail.cn99.com> (ypwang@sitechasia.com)
Subject:	Re: Win2k vs Win NT4 -how to distinguish
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010207084934 DOT 2148P-100000 AT is> <95sfgm$sne$1 AT pippin DOT nask DOT waw DOT pl> <96iivg$ssn$1 AT mail DOT cn99 DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "ypwang" <ypwang AT sitechasia DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:56:27 +0800
>
> Run the internal-command "ver" and you will get the currrent version, If we
> can use this method to get the output then we can easily point out which
> platform is running.

Let me reiterate the problem.  The issue is how do library functions
detect W2K.  Not application programs, _library_ functions.

It is IMHO inappropriate for a general-purpose library function to
invoke an external program (the shell, which implements the VER
command), especially since W2K is known to not like nested programs
too much.

I agree that, for an application code, running VER is a solution,
along a few others which where mentioned in this thread.

- Raw text -