Date:	Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:16:12 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [malfer AT teleline DOT es: Announce GRX 2.3.4]
In-Reply-To:	<96glb4$m55$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010215161508.29378B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 15 Feb 2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> *Other* DOS-based compilers
> (Borland ones, e.g.), for which these sources should also be usable,
> do not grok LF-only line ends. They'll show all kinds of curious error
> messages, mainly regarding preprocessor line continuation by
> backslash-newlines.

Are you sure?  What version of Borland's compile shows this lossage?

IIRC, Borland has no problems with Unix-style text files.

- Raw text -