| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:33:03 -0500 |
| Message-Id: | <200101230133.UAA04780@envy.delorie.com> |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <8kjp6tohorretgu7fadnh7889ub8ihfj4d@4ax.com> (message from Damian |
| Yerrick on Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:19:58 GMT) | |
| Subject: | Re: Advance warning of failure of realloc() |
| References: | <8kjp6tohorretgu7fadnh7889ub8ihfj4d AT 4ax DOT com> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> To expand an allocated memory block, I should use realloc(). But if > realloc() fails, I lose the contents of the block, correct? How can > I prevent irretrievable data loss when calling realloc()? Call malloc() and copy the data yourself. Not a perfect solution, as realloc reuses the current chunk if it can.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |