From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Help!
Date:	22 Oct 2000 11:27:32 -0700
Organization:	InterWorld Communications
Lines:	24
Sender:	nate AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu
Message-ID:	<83aebwafzf.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References:	<002001c03ac9$ebe70fc0$0500a8c0 AT brk> <39f0b88a DOT 48929103 AT news DOT freeserve DOT net> <834s27rxf2 DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu> <39f1f1fd DOT 44260315 AT news DOT freeserve DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 972239252 83098 134.173.57.219 (22 Oct 2000 18:27:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

dontmailme AT iname DOT com (Steamer) writes:

> Nate Eldredge wrote:
> 
> > Even more fun is the classic scheme
> >
> > int is_cplusplus(void)
> > {
> >   int x;
> >   x = 2-2//**/1;
> >   +1;
> >   return x;
> > }
> 
> But this assumes that // comments are not recognized in C, whereas
> the new C standard says they should be.

I know, I know.  So I guess it's really a test for C89.  But it
certainly looks a lot weirder than yours, doesn't it?

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -