From:	Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Porting DOS to linux
Organization:	Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/
Message-ID:	<vabfrsotj36qpmbbj5086bft8oqgqdfsi4@4ax.com>
References:	<8p7rou$6gi$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0009071842560 DOT 1743-100000 AT goatbeard DOT grendel DOT net>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	19
X-Trace:	/wObnYqkQkjWrEtYUDw1JGk9PLE5XV3tBdZhwL7jsf2YJLBBN8RfWrsBDrsCYv/jzYynSGT+ctiY!lIUODNgwv4gyhQ8lUCxHcaTYtqlK/Ckmj3nOET2u68ROyhKXOkndzjzb6HnKJJRhxklwcooLTr7c!m6Rdn3Q=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:00:45 GMT
Distribution:	world
Date:	Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:00:45 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:45:53 +0600 (LKT), Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel
<kalum AT lintux DOT cx> wrote:

>Actually in this respect I find that CWSDPMI+DJGPP is far more stricter
>for stray pointers and other memory problems than gcc+linux. I have found
>that CWSDPMI+DJGPP is the best environment for checking for this kind of
>problems, as GPF's, SIGSEGV's etc  are caught more readily than with
>linux.

I'd say straight DJGPP in CWSDPMI is second best.  The best AFAIK is
YAMD, yet another malloc() debugger.

-- 
Damian Yerrick
"I refuse to listen to those who refuse to listen to reason."
See the whole sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html

This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to
prevent the spread of signature viruses.  http://www.mcafee.com/

- Raw text -