From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: THE -O2 PROBLEM
Date:	Sun, 30 Apr 2000 13:24:39 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<390BFBD7.8C94443E@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<38F20E7A DOT 3330E9A4 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F6C64E DOT C7753C6C AT mtu-net DOT ru> <8d7l3g$j3i$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <38F76B94 DOT 5E968BA7 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38F78F5F DOT 25DD4C47 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <390b89b1 DOT 9812591 AT news DOT cobweb DOT com DOT au>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp101-40.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 957086831 32284 212.188.101.40 (30 Apr 2000 09:27:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	30 Apr 2000 09:27:11 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Rotes Sapiens wrote:
>
> I have another suggestion, perhaps it is a good idea not to optimise
> asm at all?  I can't see any harm in linking the asm object file into
> the program without optimising it.  Perhaps this should go in the FAQ?

:)

The preoblem was a bit different. I wanted to get my 3d engince as fast as
possible and I had a lot of inline ASM because even parameter passing and calls
reduce the performance... What you suggest is okay -- it will work. :) But how
about efficiency? My inline ASM was not just for fun. :)

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -