Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id:	<200004262018.QAA24213@indy.delorie.com>
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To:	davehurt AT flash DOT net (David Hurt)
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<mkDN4.2411$X55.302826@news.flash.net> (davehurt@flash.net)
Subject:	Re: mmap() in DJGPP
References:	<390689C2 DOT 22B4233E AT home DOT com> <8e6ao8$7jj$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <3906F9B2 DOT 17C6C4F5 AT home DOT com> <mkDN4.2411$X55 DOT 302826 AT news DOT flash DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: davehurt AT flash DOT net (David Hurt)
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:47:46 GMT
>
> This is a rather common way in Unix-ish systems to share data between two or 
> more processes.  I sincerely doubt that there is a similar facility in DOS

DOS is not the problem here.  The problem is that the DPMI 0.9 spec
doesn't support the features required to implement such a facility.

DPMI 1.0 does support those features, but there's only 1 or 2 DPMI 1.0
servers out there, and they are very rare.

- Raw text -