From:	"Alexandre Devaure" <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net>
Subject:	Re: attribute stdcall
Lines:	31
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Message-ID:	<2HyN4.3398$JA3.5430288@nnrp6.proxad.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:30:38 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	194.51.236.59
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT proxad DOT net
X-Trace:	nnrp6.proxad.net 956741438 194.51.236.59 (Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:38 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:30:38 CEST
Organization:	Guest of ProXad - France
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alexandre Devaure <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com> a écrit dans le
message : 8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net...
> Has sombody ever had compilation problem with a function declared with the
> attribute stdcall with gcc 2.95?
>
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> __attribute__((stdcall));
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> {
>     body
> }
>
> the result is :
> bmra.c:120: previous declaration of `F_WriteWords'
> bmra.c:165: conflicting types for `F_Init'
>
> If I remove the attribute, the compilation is ok.
>
> TIA
> Alex
>
>
>

I am sorry, the good message is :
bmra.c:125: conflicting types for `F_WriteWords'
bmra.c:120: previous declaration of `F_WriteWords'

- Raw text -