From:	"Jarkko Kähkönen" <Jarkko DOT Kahkonen AT mbnet DOT fi>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<h9Lg4.2696$eq DOT 31448 AT uutiset DOT nic DOT fi> <3883C036 DOT E279E731 AT home DOT comNOSPAM>
Subject:	Re: Calculating transparent pixels in Allegro
Lines:	23
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Message-ID:	<T43h4.2792$eq.32988@uutiset.nic.fi>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 21:26:20 +0200
NNTP-Posting-Host:	212.38.231.221
X-Trace:	uutiset.nic.fi 948223411 212.38.231.221 (Tue, 18 Jan 2000 21:23:31 EET)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 21:23:31 EET
Organization:	NIC Tietoverkot Oy - NIC Data Networks Ltd.
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>> I use Allegro.
>> And I have a program, which calc transparency of about 16 000 pixels in
one
>> frame.:)
>> If I use getpixel, getr16, getg16 and getb16 and some other functions to
get
>> transparent color between two colors, it is too slow. I use 640x480/16bit
>> mode.


>
>Have you considered blitting the entire screen or image to a memory buffer,
and
>comparing from that directly?

How I can do it?


Jarkko Kähkönen
Jarkko DOT Kahkonen AT mbnet DOT REMOVETHIS DOT fi

- Raw text -