From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gdb front-ends
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:26:13 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000118102552.3041U-100000@is>
References:	<000b8d9b DOT bd249425 AT usw-ex0102-016 DOT remarq DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 948184168 11858 199.203.121.2 (18 Jan 2000 08:29:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Jan 2000 08:29:28 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<000b8d9b.bd249425@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Charlie wrote:

> What front ends are available for gdb to give an interface more like
> Visual C++? I had a very quick play with fsdb but it didn't seem to
> like C++ exceptions. I need the debugger to also work well with
> templates.

Please read chapter 12 of the DJGPP FAQ list, it has some
recommendations for C++ debugging, especially in sections 12.1 and
12.5.

> I've used RHIDE up till now, but it seems a little flaky in debugging

Care to explain what problems did you see?  We cannot help you without
knowing the details.  ``Flaky'' is not enough.

> and doesn't appear to be maintained.

How so?  A new beta was announced less than a month ago.

- Raw text -