From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is there an option in DJGPP to name functions name as is?
Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:52:05 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	9
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991129185046.17863E-100000@is>
References:	<9FE%3.35$t12 DOT 2812 AT newscontent-01 DOT sprint DOT ca> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991128114608 DOT 6867S-100000 AT is> <ksf04.1775$t12 DOT 89001 AT newscontent-01 DOT sprint DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 943894234 14787 199.203.121.2 (29 Nov 1999 16:50:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 Nov 1999 16:50:34 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<ksf04.1775$t12.89001@newscontent-01.sprint.ca>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Jay wrote:

> For many compilers the stdcall convention does not generate the underscores,
> so linking libs from those don't work.

Linking with libraries produced by other compilers usually doesn't work 
at all.  So stdcall is not an issue.  See section 17.5 of the DJGPP FAQ 
for more details.

- Raw text -