From:	"Dave Dutcher" <ddutcher AT symbology DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject:	Re: Iteration vs. Recursion...
Date:	27 Jul 1999 21:44:32 GMT
Organization:	StarNet Communications, Inc.
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<01bed879$332ecc60$9154f6cc@symbology.symbology.com>
References:	<7n7s1h$ms6$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <37978194 DOT 17661031 AT news DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	204.246.84.145
X-Trace:	blackice.winternet.com 933111872 20772 204.246.84.145 (27 Jul 1999 21:44:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT winternet DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	27 Jul 1999 21:44:32 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I think the problem with the original code was calling getch() in every if
statement, and previous responses have explained how to fix the problem.

But I couldn't help noticing that a lot of people suggested switch
statements.  I wonder if people suggested a switch statement because the
orignal poster was looking to increase his speed, or did they suggest it
because they think switch statements are more readable?  I am wondering
because, from what I have heard, switch statements are no faster than a
whole bunch of if statements.

Dave.

Peter Johnson <locke AT mcs DOT net> wrote in article
<37978194 DOT 17661031 AT news DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>...
> Do something like the following:
> 
> switch(getch()) {
> case x:	run_program1();
> 	break;
> case y:	run_program2();
> 	break;
> ...
> }
> 
> Read up on switch statements in your favorite C reference book :).
> 

- Raw text -