Message-ID:	<3745E070.FDB455C7@enter.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 May 1999 18:38:40 -0400
From:	Sean <sproctor AT enter DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: uclock trouble
References:	<v01540b00b36af6639283@[145.18.167.138]>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Ronald Landheer wrote:
> 
> >Thanks a lot. :)  No, it was more like 70000 uclocks :P cause it would
> >count up to around 0x1200 then go down to 0x10000.  I'm not converting
> >hex in my head, but I think that's around 70000.  What you said worked
> >great, thanks again.
> 0x10000 = 65536 (I do convert hex in my head)
> 
> Greetz!
> 
> Ronald

I meant 0x10000 + 0x1200.  Do I have to do it just to prove myself?  I
can't.  I tried.  I'll type it. 65536 + 4096 + 512 (I can't add those in
my without seeing them for some reason) 70144.  See, I was really
close.  Kinda useless to add them since that was just an estimate
anyway.  But I had to just cause of that.  Call it pride or stupidity,
same thing sometimes.

Sean

- Raw text -