From:	XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ? array[n] or array[n+1] ?
Date:	Fri, 14 May 1999 00:44:15 GMT
Organization:	Telefonica Transmision de Datos
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<373d718b.2239096@noticias.iies.es>
References:	<37367f71 DOT 6271443 AT news DOT wanadoo DOT fr> <3736A098 DOT 55E268BE AT softhome DOT net> <373c0195 DOT 3902906 AT news DOT wanadoo DOT fr> <3737f542 DOT 0 AT nnrp1 DOT news DOT uk DOT psi DOT net> <3739F455 DOT 1818FDD7 AT unb DOT ca> <373a1915 DOT 3102234 AT noticias DOT iies DOT es> <373B61C6 DOT 20FA8B62 AT unb DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	iies218.iies.es
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

El día Thu, 13 May 1999 19:35:34 -0400, Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
escribió:

>> >Outcome #3:  Something terrible might happen.  Worst case scenario (never known
>> >anyone it has happened to, but it's possible): overwriting some buffered portion
>> >of a hard-drive or memory mapped io could desroy data or hardware.
>> Hardware? You must be joking.
>
>    Well, there's the old story about the non-multi-sync monitors that you could
>break if you switched the mode too fast.  
[snipped]

OK, I get the idea. But I think it is just too difficult to make any
of these things happen.

Regards,
GUILLE

----
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)

- Raw text -