Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:42:52 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc:	Artur Zaroda <zaroda AT ghost DOT mimuw DOT edu DOT pl>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: cxxfilt.exe in bnu281b.zip and gxx.exe in djdev202.zip
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.A41.4.05.9901281326280.53610-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990128134109.16407E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> > Isn't it better to remove -lgpp at all?  I don't think g++ on Unix does 
> > that anymore, does it?
> 
> Of course. If we are removing -lgpp from gxx.exe then I
> think there is no more any need for it except than linking libm.a.

What about -lstdcxx?  That one still needs to be mentioned.

As for -lm, I always thought that some classes in libstdcxx.a require 
libm.a.  Isn't that correct anymore?

- Raw text -