X-Authentication-Warning:	ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:34:05 +0200 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc:	Artur Zaroda <zaroda AT ghost DOT mimuw DOT edu DOT pl>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: cxxfilt.exe in bnu281b.zip and gxx.exe in djdev202.zip
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990128130539.16407A-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.9901281326280.53610-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > Currently in djdev202 it is even broken as
> > -lgpp is placed after -lstdc++ (should be before it). 
> 
> Isn't it better to remove -lgpp at all?  I don't think g++ on Unix does 
> that anymore, does it?

Of course. If we are removing -lgpp from gxx.exe then I
think there is no more any need for it except than linking libm.a.
But I think that possibility to choose whether to link in libm.a
should be left to user. 

If we accept this than gpp.exe from gcc or egcs binary archive does
all needed things and we can safely remove gxx.exe from djdev.

Andris

- Raw text -