From:	Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ASM - DJGPP or NASM??
Date:	Wed, 04 Nov 1998 22:29:40 -0500
Organization:	Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines:	5
Message-ID:	<36411BA4.142E@cam.org>
References:	<901B28EBDD5339C7 DOT B24EDDF6C4D6058F DOT BFBD19D847AA4B0E AT library-proxy DOT airnews DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dialup-473.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

you can use either one, it doesn't really matter, it's just a matter of
taste. NASM has Intel-like syntax while DJGPP has AT&T syntax. It's not
true that NASM supports only 16 bit code, it supports a lot of different
formats. you can compile DJGPP objects (coff objects) straight from
NASM.

- Raw text -