From:	Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: printf bug ???
Date:	Fri, 05 Jun 1998 18:45:33 -0700
Organization:	Alcyone Systems
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<35789F3D.2DFEFD31@alcyone.com>
References:	<35784752 DOT B7BF8C31 AT hamburg DOT netsurf DOT de> <35785655 DOT 74D7EAD3 AT lucent DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	charmaine.alcyone.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Bob Lied wrote:

> The solution is, "Don't do that."  The order of parameter
> evaluation is compiler-dependent, and the order of applying
> multiple post-increments is compiler-dependent. Depending on
> the compiler, you could also get "1 1 2", "1 2 3", or "3 3 3".

Printing "0 0 0" or crashing would, perhaps surprisingly, be acceptable
from a perfectly ANSI compliant compiler.

-- 
         Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / mailto:max AT alcyone DOT com
                       Alcyone Systems / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, California, United States / icbm:+37.20.07/-121.53.38
                                     \
           She glanced at her watch / . . . It was 9:23.
                                   / James Clavell

- Raw text -