Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/03/07/12:15:46
| From: | Renaud Capolunghi <capolun AT cmla DOT ens-cachan DOT fr>
|
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
| Subject: | DJGPP + RsxNT/DJ or EMXNT09c+RSXNT ?
|
| Date: | Sat, 07 Mar 1998 17:57:48 +0100
|
| Organization: | ENS-Cachan
|
| Lines: | 21
|
| Message-ID: | <35017C8C.3D76@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
|
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | riz.cmla.ens-cachan.fr
|
| Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Working on Unix stations and a PC under win95 (slow machine), I built
a small GUI interface in C++ that allows me to display graphics with
simple menus both on X11/Unix and on a PC using DJGPP+GRX22.
I am just beginning to deal with win32-GUI programming (not really
different from Xlib but still have to become familiar with it). I
aim to pass from GRX22 to RSXNT(/DJ?) and I would have on both
platforms nice native applications. The question is: do I continue
with Djgpp and use RsxNT/DJ or do I pass to a Win32 compiler like
NT09C ditribution with RsxNT? (Or what could be the advantage to use
DjGPP if I don't use GRX any longer ?)
Except the
graphic stuff, if I choose to use NT09C+RSXNT, does the porting from
DjGPP suffers from compatibility problems?
(For example, it seems that the erf() function in "math.h" is not
implemented in nt09c distribution, neither in RsxNTDJ ... and I need
it).
renaud c.
- Raw text -