www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part) (Dominique Biesmans) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Return Types for Constructors |
Date: | Mon, 08 Dec 1997 18:58:36 GMT |
Organization: | EUnet Belgium, Leuven, Belgium |
Lines: | 24 |
Message-ID: | <348c4260.323656@news.eunet.be> |
References: | <01bd0366$cfe6d140$d744e4cf AT cadvision DOT com> <348BA5D2 DOT 503C AT rug DOT ac DOT be> |
Reply-To: | Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part) |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | dialup112.leuven.eunet.be |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
>constructors always return void, so you should have written instead: absolutely NOT!!! Constructors don't have a type Please don't try to answer the question, if you're not familiar with the subject, you only confuse people. To the original poster : post your header declaration, otherwise something like this should always work : // declaration class A { // ... public: A(): // default constructor // ... } A::A() { // implementation }
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |