From:	Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Intel ASM Possible
Date:	Wed, 08 Jan 1997 15:59:52 -0800
Organization:	Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<32D434F8.538F@cam.org>
References:	<32CEF7D5 DOT 32F2 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <32D24646 DOT 5939 AT redestb DOT es>
Reply-To:	tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynppp-182.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Jorge Fernandez Suarez wrote:
> Me too... but maybe nobody wants to spend time on it...
That's not the point.DJGPP ust ensure compatibility with GCC.And GCC
uses AT&T syntax because GCC is a UNIX based compiler.UNIX was developed
in the AT&T labs(AFAIK;correct me if I'm wrong) so the AT&T syntax was
used.
There is one translator at x2ftp.oulu.fi or you could try NASM wich is
free.
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
yoda69 'at' hotmail 'dot' com
http://www.cam.org/~tudor

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d-(--) s(-):(+) a? C+ UL>++++ P L>+++++ E- W++ N o K---(----) w---
O---- M-- V-? PS+++ PE Y PGP t+ 5-- X+++>++++ R tv b+ DI D+ G e->++
h>++ r- y>+++++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

- Raw text -