| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Xref: | news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:5883 |
| From: | Norbert Jay <norbertj AT panix DOT com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Beating fflush to death |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jul 1996 14:43:14 -0700 |
| Organization: | PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC |
| Lines: | 15 |
| Message-ID: | <31E423F2.5386@panix.com> |
| Reply-To: | norbertj AT panix DOT com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | norbertj.dialup.access.net |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
My how to write C books says that SOMETIMES scanf leaves a newline
character behind in the buffer. The book suggests fflush(stdin) which as
we all know does not work. I use gets(dum) (char dum[1]) to clear the
buffer after each scanf fpr this particular program.
1. Will this work on ALL versions of DOS? If so, why is something like
it built into the lib?
2. The FAQ suggests using sync() but gives no hint how or why?
3. Browsing that great mail archive in delorie's home page confused me
even more what with scanf("%*[^\n]\n") which I could not get to work.
4. Is the inconsistency between systems like DOS - UNIX or is it internal
to each system
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |