Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4139
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!barney.gvi.net!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!kira.cc.uakron.edu!neoucom.edu!news.ysu.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!cs.city.ac.uk!sl323
From:	sl323 AT city DOT ac DOT uk (Mark Lewis)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	v2b4 and stability
Date:	5 Jan 1996 12:13:41 GMT
Organization:	School of Informatics, City University, London
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<4cj4ll$fud@bambam.soi.city.ac.uk>
Reply-To:	M DOT Lewis AT city DOT ac DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Host:	paddington.city.ac.uk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

I'm going to be compiling some security-critical software in the near future
using DJGPP and I'd like to use v2 rather than 1.12m4, but I'm a little
concerned about stability, particularly with regard to the use of gcc-2.7.1.
I've been using v2b3 without any problems, but since b4 is now available
(and is the "final beta") I'd rather use that.  Any chance of other versions
of gcc being made available with v2b4, such as 2.6.3 and 2.7.2?  I'd be
happier about using 2.6.3 than 2.7.1 atm.  Thanks.

	Mark.

--
..--------------------------{ From:  Mark Lewis }--------------------------.
|   Computing Services     |     http://www.city.ac.uk/~sl323/            |
|   City University        |     PGP public key available by WWW, or by   |
|   London,  England       |     fingering sl323 AT finger DOT city DOT ac DOT uk        |
`--------{ M DOT Lewis AT city DOT ac DOT uk (MIME) | nostra AT city DOT ac DOT uk (MIME) }---------'

- Raw text -