Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 93 17:06:23 EDT
From:	peprbv AT cfa0 DOT harvard DOT edu (Bob Babcock)
To:	dj AT ctron DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject:	managing diff's

>In cases like this, it's probably acceptable to post the two together,
>since BC3.1 fixes aren't really "features".

I uploaded my patches to
   omnigate.clarkson.edu:pub/msdos/djgpp/pub/patches-1.09.
File is rwb_bc31.zip.  These are in "diff -c2" format, as specified in
readme.1st.  But, looking back at the announcement of the above directory,
I see it says "diff -c3".  Which is preferred?  If the answer is -c3, I'll
redo them.

Most of the changes are fixing things which trigger warnings in BC 3.1.
The other thing is adding support for some of the FCB functions to exphdler.c.

- Raw text -