Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<011f01c2df37$49bb6b50$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Pavel Tsekov" <ptsekov AT gmx DOT net>, <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302281021240 DOT 1190-100000 AT moria DOT atlanticsky DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin=ntsec:[no]strict
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:40:07 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>>> - The new setup is out, with my ntsec patch. That will greatly
>>>  alleviate the problem you describe in the next paragraph.
>> 
>> I was getting the feeling that Robert thought there was no pressing
>> need for a new setup to be released.  It sounds like this is a
>> pressing need.
> 
> IMO, there is no pressing need to release setup.exe from HEAD - there
> are still bugs in it. Pierre's  patch can be applied on the stable
> branch (setup-200207 i think) though. Then a new 2.249.2.x version of
> setup will be released which cures the permissions problem.

Actually, setup-200207 = 2.259.2.x
          setup-200206 = 2.249.2.x

Max.

- Raw text -