Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E4D09CD.1000709@hekimian.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:22:53 -0500
X-Sybari-Trust:	597e29e4 f29b823d 2b08c392 00000139
From:	Joe Buehler <jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com>
Reply-To:	jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com
Organization:	Spirent Communications, Inc.
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc static constructor multi-threading flaw
References:	<3E4D06B8 DOT 5010306 AT hekimian DOT com> <20030214151314 DOT GA18458 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030214151314.GA18458@redhat.com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> If this is a general gcc issue, then you should ping the gcc mailing list.

I had the discussion on the gcc list some time ago.  E.g.:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00248.html

Do you want me to ping them again?
-- 
Joe Buehler

- Raw text -