Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<017f01c21b0d$e3568c20$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<001001c21afa$8123fa00$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020623212533 DOT GA28284 AT redhat DOT com> <00b301c21b02$9aca50f0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020623230156 DOT GA16848 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Release of the <sys/ipc.h> and <sys/shm.h> files
Date:	Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:29:56 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> I think these files have lived in the repository long enough.  If we
> aren't going to have a working ipc in this release then they should
be
> removed.  I kept them there for the convenience of the developers
but
> convenience only lasts so long.
>
> I've moved the files out of include/sys and put them in the top
level.
> When we have a working System V shm/ipc, then we can put them back.
> That means that anyone who is depending on these files will have to
do
> some hand copying but I think that's better than the alternative.
>
> Since these files are causing consistent problems for people, it
doesn't
> make any sense for them to be installed by default, whether it is in
a
> release or in a snapshot.  I was willing to let the snapshots be a
> little broken for a little while but it isn't a little while
anymore.

Looks good to me.

// Conrad

- Raw text -