Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: has anyone run the test suite recently?
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 09:02:27 -0400
Message-ID:	<002301c20323$4205a4c0$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<007601c20317$b09374a0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Virus-Scanned:	Cape.Com VirusScan, no known virus found

Conrad Scott writes:
>
>"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>> If anyone has the time, I'd be interested in seeing if there
>> are any regressions from 1.3.10 an the latest snapshot/cvs.
>>
>
>I did notice that if I compiled cygwin (i.e. the dll and so forth) with the
>current release (1.3.10-1) installed on my machine, I got a sequence of
>problems with the tests. But if I installed a newly built copy of cygwin
and
>*then* re-built and re-tested the same source tree, it all passed fine.
I'll
>try this again and preserve some log files.

I had similar results when running the regression test with a
locally built Cygwin < build date May 11 > installed, however
after copying the newly built cywin1.dll into /bin and rerunning
the regression test no unexpected errors were reported.

this is consistant with Conrad's findings

Cheers

Norman

- Raw text -