Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:21:24 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: null parameters to functions
Message-ID:	<20020220222124.GD3196@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<01c901c1ba5b$e3dee330$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<01c901c1ba5b$e3dee330$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:13:56AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Remembering all the effort that went into sanitising various userland
>function parameters a few months ago... newlib suffers from similar
>flaws (I just noticed one with strcmp (0, foo);).
>
>Is this something worth fixing?

Agh.  How does linux handle this?  Doe sit return EADDR or something?

cgf

- Raw text -