Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:26:09 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: AF_UNIX on win95?
Message-ID:	<20010912132609.H1312@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1000310173.30375.137.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i

Rob,

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 01:56:12AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> FWIW waitforsingleobject in fhandler_scoket::check_peer_secret_event is
> returning 258.

The above implies that WaitForSingleObject() is returning WAIT_TIMEOUT.
FWIW, I recently fixed this (at least for NT/2000):

    http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2001-q3/msg00082.html

Like Egor, I don't know why its failing under 95.

HTH,
Jason

- Raw text -