Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac@local>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<005101c11036$06368800$806410ac AT local> <20010719112939 DOT A5093 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: fork on win95
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:53:31 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	19 Jul 2001 21:40:05.0730 (UTC) FILETIME=[5FDBCC20:01C1109B]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>


> Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
> this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.

I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm still pleading
time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum (ie strace
sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything else that might
spark neurons?

> Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)

I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.

Rob

- Raw text -