Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: Local Setup Cache
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:16:44 +1000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Message-ID:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F0D7@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic:	Local Setup Cache
Thread-Index:	AcEDZYBYqRl0xNPeRCKdIKX1z/ulNgAAHBwA
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id WAA01344

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Vine [mailto:nhv AT cape DOT com]
>
> Robert Collins writes:
> >
> >    FLTK sees to require a _lot_ more effort on the part of 
> the programmer,
> >larger recreating the wheel. (ie handling a window resize 
> has to be done by
> >hand). Whats the advantage of that wxWindows?
> 
> did you see the resizable() method ?
> 

Yes - the doco seemed to say that by default the resizeable() method
isn't needed, that the bounding box of the outer window is determined by
the window manager.

> >If FTLK can do effective MDI-style windows under X, I'm 
> quite willing to
> put
> >in extra effort (wxWindows does that very poorly), but 
> otherwise I see
> >little reason to spend time writing window management code 
> instead of .rc
> >manipulation code.
> 
> Hmm..
> maybe $FLTK_SRC / test / tile.cxx is what you want.
> IMHO - This is a good demo of the resizable() method

It's the MDI aspect I'm looking at, not the resizeable() per se. Can you
comment on the testcase? What am I doing wrong?

Rob
 
> Cheers
> 
> Norman
> 
> 

- Raw text -