Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: A cygwin mailing list experiment
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2001 09:05:29 -0400
Message-ID:	<002e01c0d7bf$8f8ece00$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-reply-To:	<20010508082052.G21710@redhat.com>
Importance:	Normal

Christopher Faylor writes:
>
>It looks like I have things tuned well enough to accomodate the recent
>increases in activity.  I do think that there are procedural ways to
>deal with the problems in the list, though.
>
>Improving cygwin's documentation and making it available as a man or
>info page is one way.
>
>Weekly FAQ submissions is another.
>
>Standardized FAQ-like responses to repeated queries (e.g., "Why doesn't
>chmod work") is another.

Have you cosidered having a wiki based Cygwin FAQ

There are many but this is one of the better ones.
http://twiki.org/

Cheers

Norman Vine

- Raw text -