| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <01e101c0b194$62fe19f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <01b101c0b190$02df27c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010320181240 DOT A1433 AT redhat DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: pthread_kill prototype |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:20:42 +1100 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
| X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 20 Mar 2001 23:15:07.0693 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A828DD0:01C0B193] |
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg01276.html pthread_kill is current defined in pthread.h as int pthread_kill(pthread_t *, int sig); it is also defined in sys/signal.h as int pthread_kill(pthread_t, int sig); the definition in sys/signal.h is the posixly correct one. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:12 AM Subject: Re: pthread_kill prototype > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:49:23AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >Chris, > > what was the verdict on fixing this? pthread_kill is protoyped (and > >implemented) incorrectly in pthread.h & thread.cc (conflicts with > >newlibs sys/signal.h). Looking at doco on the web, the correct answer is > >to change thread.cc, but that will break binary compatibility. > > I don't recall this being discussed before. What is the difference > in prototyping that will break compatibility? More details, please. > > cgf >
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |