| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <00a601c0b0b4$2ede8230$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <002701c0af7c$fac67710$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010318120654 DOT C12880 AT redhat DOT com> <007f01c0aff1$9889f110$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <00f401c0b064$f3a15a70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010319124545 DOT C18807 AT redhat DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: pthreads |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:35:47 +1100 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
| X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 19 Mar 2001 20:30:09.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[64866DE0:01C0B0B3] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:45 AM Subject: Re: pthreads > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:08:27PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >I'm not 100% sure we follow the calling thread's state rather than the > >mainthreads state, but I'll look into that. > > We should duplicate the calling thread's state. This was a customer > problem report a couple of years ago and I went to great efforts to fix > it. If we don't do that then we definitely won't duplicate the main > thread's state, so the alternative is that we would probably crash > or hang, or something. > > cgf > Thanks. I'll assume we do, and confirm when we I look at the pthread_fork functions. Rob
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |