Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Matt <matt AT use DOT net>
X-Sender:	matt AT cesium DOT clock DOT org
To:	cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	failed malloc()?
Message-ID:	<Pine.NEB.4.10.10011251517570.14159-100000@cesium.clock.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:41:59 -0800

I've started reviewing some of the winsup code and had a question as to
how to most properly correct unchecked pointers. That is, I know to add a
statement to check the freshly created/passed pointer, but not what to do
in the instance that pointer is NULL. 

Some places in the cygwin code do a system_printf() which is what I will
assume is desired, but wanted to check to make sure what the
standard/preferred way of handling such things is (if there is one).

Here one of the sections of code I am looking at (cygcheck.c:91,92):
  paths[num_paths] = (char *) malloc (maxlen + 1);
  memcpy (paths[num_paths], s, maxlen);

- Raw text -