Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:24:06 +0400
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.45) Personal
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
Organization:	DEO
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<161241708588.20000904172406@logos-m.ru>
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: testsuite signal handling patch
In-reply-To:	<006c01c0166a$1d308f40$0201a8c0@sos>
References:	<51226485839 DOT 20000904131022 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<147231928395 DOT 20000904144106 AT logos-m DOT ru> <006c01c0166a$1d308f40$0201a8c0 AT sos>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Monday, 04 September, 2000 Sergey Okhapkin sos AT prospect DOT com DOT ru wrote:

>> btw,  shouldn't  call_handler()  set  signal  handler to SIG_DFL while
>> program is in handler?

SO> It depends of how the handler was set. It's true for signal() call, but the
SO> behavior for sigaction() call should depend of sa_mask and sa_flags fields
SO> of struct sigaction.

i mean that cygwin doesn't seem to honor sa_flags currently. as far as
i    understood    from   sources,   we   should   pass   pointer   to
 pinfo->sigs[signo] and sigsave.func as parameters to _sigreturn;
and  interrupt_now   should  set siga.handler to SIG_DFL, if sa_flags
contains SA_RESETHAND

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

- Raw text -