Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D997917174B@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com>
From:	"Fifer, Eric" <EFifer AT sanwaint DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'"
	<cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	poll() fix
Date:	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:59:05 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

I think that the tests checking the results returned
from cygwin_select should not be negated.

Regards,

Eric Fifer

ChangeLog

	* poll.cc (poll): Fix erroneous negations.


--- poll.cc-	Mon Jul 17 16:52:15 2000
+++ poll.cc	Mon Jul 17 16:53:57 2000
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ poll (struct pollfd *fds, unsigned int n
         else
 	  {
             fds[i].revents = 0;
-	    if (!FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &read_fds))
+	    if (FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &read_fds))
 	      fds[i].revents |= POLLIN;
-	    if (!FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &write_fds))
+	    if (FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &write_fds))
 	      fds[i].revents |= POLLOUT;
-	    if (!FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &except_fds))
+	    if (FD_ISSET (fds[i].fd, &except_fds))
 	      fds[i].revents |= POLLPRI;
 	  }
       }

- Raw text -