Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/09/16/14:50:49
On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 11:09:56PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> IMHO, the following patch, which checks
> the suffix '.sh' and moreover the first
> bytes in a file, slows down 'ls -l' only
> a little bit, but gives more info.
In retrospect, I don't think we should have added the .shc
bit. I would rather test for .sh as you are doing here.
Anyone have any opinions about reading the file here to check for
script status? I'll test this and see what difference I see...
--
Geoffrey Noer
noer AT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -