Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/1998/02/02/06:47:58
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> That's what got me thinking, actually. I know that your new mechanism
> changes things in the fork code. The last time I looked, it actually had
> a few more "sychronization events" between parent and child than
previously.
One more synchronization point added if data areas of some _dynamically_
loaded dlls must be copied on fork. If no additional dlls are in use, the
number of synchronization points is the same.
--
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job.
- Raw text -