Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>
To:	"'Earnie Boyd'" <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: New setup.exe snapshot 2.249.2.2
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:41:38 +1000
Message-ID:	<007f01c21084$8bc90610$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<3D04AB7F.C82B0788@yahoo.com>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com 
> [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
> Sent: Monday, 10 June 2002 11:37 PM

> > > Perhaps a #define UNICODE before #include <windows.h> would help?
> > 
> > We can't rely on the MS layer for unicode on win9x. Doesn't 
> the above
> > require that? I hesitate to look at multiple binaries either :[.
> > 
> 
> If you wish to continue supporting W9x, and I suppose you do, 
> perhaps an
> alternative binary would suffice, I.E.: A binary with UNICODE and a
> binary without UNICODE?

I'd rather not do that, at least until we have less wishlist items. The
more complexity 'out there', the more support issues. Plus I've not
tried a UNICODE build, so it'll probably raise many more issues all of
it's own.

Rob

- Raw text -