Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de>
To:	"Nick Clifton" <nickc AT cambridge DOT redhat DOT com>
Cc:	"Cygwin-Apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>,
	"Binutils" <binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: question about objdump output format ?
Date:	Fri, 24 May 2002 12:03:14 +0200
Message-ID:	<007e01c2030a$3829b950$905f07d5@BRAMSCHE>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<m3y9earl9a.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>

> Hi Ralf,
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the windows runtime linker allows rebinding of dll's and exe for
> which I have
> > written a tool currently located on the kde-cygwin project on
> > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=27249.
> >
> > A side effect of this is, that objdump prints each line twice (the
> second line
> > contains no additional infos), which blows up listing on bigger libs (for
> > example about 35000 lines of 100860 for the kdecore dll from kde
> 2.2.2), so my
> > question is, are there any objections for removing this ?
>
> Err, sorry, I do not quite understand your question.  What is it that
> you are asking to remove ?
>
        DLL Name: qt-2-3.dll
        vma:  Hint/Ord Member-Name
        181798    844  _7QString$null   5ff556b8   (1)
        The Import Address Table (difference found)
        vma:  Hint/Ord Member-Name
        5ff556b8          844  _7QString$null      (2)

line (1) contains all information which is printed in (2), so line (2) seems to
be obsolate for me.

Regards
Ralf

- Raw text -