www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 23:11, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > > I'm open to ideas for renaming, but ... posix:// is wrong (it's not a > > posix provider per se - it's a cygwin mounted structure provider). (And > > posix:// is the most obvious alternative to cygfile:// for me.) > > The cygfile:// is fine, it's the reference to "MinGW land" which exists at > www.mingw.org that will confuse some search engine user that I'm concerned > with. You don't have a library for "MinGW land". You have methods that you use > use mingw to build or more precisely you use -mno-cygwin to build, correct? I was articulating what cygfile does for you. I wouldn't normally refer to it as MingW land :}. To be precise we have methods that execute using the mingw libc and provide access to the cygwin directory structure. The build process is irrelevant - real mingw or -mno-cygwin the result is the same. (Or maybe I'm just missing your point?) Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |