Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2002 09:34:28 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: rebasing new packages?!
In-reply-to:	<3CD1DDA8.60907@ece.gatech.edu>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020503133428.GD3216@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.24i
References:
	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F9A AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	<3CD1DDA8 DOT 60907 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>

Chuck,

On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:45:28PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it away from STL 
> and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right?  I mean, Jason didn't go 
> absolutely template-crazy, did he?

No, actual my (initial) rebase patch does not use templates at all.

BTW, while I was flying to CA on a business trip a few weeks ago, I
started to refactor my free_list and used_list classes to use a (STL-like)
set template class.  I was doing pretty good until I got to iterators...

Nevertheless, every minute that I spent on reimplementing STL
functionality just felt plain wrong.  There is no way that I could
(re)implement anything close to the quality of an STL container class.

Jason

- Raw text -