Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: rebasing new packages?!
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2002 10:59:43 +1000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5F9B@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	"Stipe Tolj" <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>,
	"cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g430xrI31842

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM

> Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and 
> install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin 
> package).

Exactly, in fact libstdc++ is required.
 
> Not having looked at Jason's code, I can't comment on the design; 
> however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it 
> away from STL 
> and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right?  I mean, Jason didn't go 
> absolutely template-crazy, did he?

The design wasn't STL bound, it's more at the pattern level rather than
which specific container he used. It's all in the archives.

Rob

- Raw text -