| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | "Harold Hunt" <huntharo AT msu DOT edu> |
| To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Cc: | "cygx" <cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | [ANNOUNCEMENT] Cygwin/XFree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Apr 2002 01:30:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID: | <NHEELHJHHFKPMAEAFMFCGEAOCNAA.huntharo@msu.edu> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| In-Reply-To: | <NHEELHJHHFKPMAEAFMFCOEANCNAA.huntharo@msu.edu> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
I just updated the packages at
ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/
to have a working dependency between XFree86-base and the base XFree86
packages, such as XFree86-xserv, XFree86-fnts, etc.
There were two changes required:
1) 'touch contrib/XFree86/XFree86-base/XFree86-base-4.2.0-1.tar.bz2'
2) upset took the list of requirements from XFree86-base/setup.hint and put
them in quotes ("cygwin ...") when it created setup.ini. upset didn't do
this for any other packages and the Cygwin setup.ini doesn't have quotes
around dependency lists, so I guess that the quotes were peculiar to this
version of upset, perhaps combined with a list of dependencies that is
longer than one line. I removed the quotes from the 'requires' list from
XFree86-base and all is now well.
Dependencies work for installing. The behavior I noticed when uninstalling
is that dependencies are ignored. I'm guessing that setup.exe was designed
that way because there isn't really a good way to handle dependencies when
uninstalling.
Harold
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |