Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020331232437.24601.qmail@web20004.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:24:37 -0800 (PST)
From:	Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: more and base
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3CA54463.2000103@ece.gatech.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

> 1) metapackages: empty packages that merely require 27 others === the 
> 'standard' install package, then the 'development' install package, etc
>    --> single 'point of control'.  To add a new package to the 
> 'development' metapackage, you merely update its requirements: line. 
> Thus, 'development' = the set of packages and their dependencies as 
> listed in the development/setup.hint file.

Since this would work, and (if I understand it correctly) not require any 
changes to setup.exe, could we start using it now?
At least temporarily? 
It seems this would help the "more and base" controversy.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
http://greetings.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -