| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
| content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
| Subject: | RE: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:51:00 +1100 |
| Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014BCE@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
| X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
| X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
| Thread-Topic: | RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX) |
| Thread-Index: | AcHMJ7NcQNpsujAfTviUFjR+OHaOEwAABD+g |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | "egor duda" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Cc: | "Lapo Luchini" <lapo AT lapo DOT it> |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2FDpES00943 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: egor duda [mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:42 AM > To: Robert Collins > > Not that i'm against inclusion of upx to cygwin distro -- > it's a normal package like many others after all, but i > really don't understand why somebody would want to use such a program. Very good points. There are some cases where it is definitely useful. I'd certainly do some performance testing before using on often called software - ie ash. But for something like setup.exe itself, download time reductions would be well worth a couple of extra page faults at runtime. As for mapping the image against the disk image or the pagefile, I think it's back to case by case testing. Certainly I can imagine that with a compressed exe on a NTFS partition, or a FAT16 compressed volume, that making the least random access hits back against the .exe is more efficient. Rob
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |