Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:39:01 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe command line options
Message-ID:	<20020123223901.GA23219@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<00b301c1a45e$82614b60$81293c3e AT Obsession>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<00b301c1a45e$82614b60$81293c3e@Obsession>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:36:44PM -0000, keith_starsmeare AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk wrote:
>I've made some progress, but it's still (infuriatingly) not at the stage
>where you can do a whole installation without dialog boxes (no offense -
>they're lovely dialog boxes!), but you can certainly have *fewer* dialog
>boxes!
>
>I'm wondering if I could submit what I have so far, and either leave some
>bits #ifdef'd out (how does the undefined macro
>COMMAND_LINE_OPTIONS_FULLY_IMPLEMENTED sound!?) or just miss those bits out
>completely from my diff.
>
>I was hoping to submit the final fully working diffs, but I'm only working
>in my spare time and everytime I have a look at the latest sources they've
>moved on so far.... I'm always playing catch up! I've done a lot of the
>grunt work; and I'd like some feedback on what I've done.

Does it even need to be commented out?  It seems like, if it works partially,
we just have a partial implementation.  No need to suffer the bit rot assocated
with ifdefs.

cgf

- Raw text -